DigiHack - Digital Photography projects

Thursday, February 03, 2005

Tilt-Shift PC Lens

dennison bertram tilt shift

Here is another fairly easy hack that if you like it, and use it, can save you goo-gobs of money. Build your own tilt-shift lens. I know there are people out there who would love to experiment with a PC Shift lens, but the cost of purchasing one is generally prohibitive unless you plan to shoot professionally with the lens. (A nikon shift lens with tilt functions cost over $1000, BTW: The Nikon guys once took a look over this and said, "why would you do that to such a nice camera? We sell that lens you know." I know. That's the point). There are companies out there that sell variations of this type of hack. Lensbabies in particular I am familiar with, and they look like they have a good product. This is the same thing, works on the same principle, except perhaps in some respects it might exceed the optical quality that you can get from commercially available PC lens hacks. The reason? The image quality here is determined by your lens, the lens that I use is an old Carl Zeiss 80mm prime lens intended for medium format. *Crisp* More than that however, they are also fairly inexpensive. Take a look for Pentacon Six lenss on ebay. They don't run very much.

dennison bertram tilt shift


A word about the lens. In this hack the key element is the lens, and you need something pretty specific for the hack to work. The lens you use must be intended for a format larger than the format you intend to use the lens on. IE: In this example i use a lens intended for 6x6 image on a 35mm camera. If I wanted to build this for medium format I would not only need a larger plunger, but a lens that was capable of at least 6x8, with 6x9 being preferable. The reason is that the lens works by playing with the fact that we can take advantage of the format differences (once again) to give us a little extra space between the camera body and then lens to add some rubbery stuff . In this case, a plunger. So, lets get to it.

What you'll need:

1. Lens - (see above)
2. Rubber Plunger - (any type will do, as long as it's flexible and not too large.)
3. Cardboard - (something stiff and not corrugated)
4. Plastic Body cap

I you notice I use body caps a lot in my work. They are the perfect way to attach your camera to something else, something it probably was never intended to be attached to. Anyway, pick one up.

dennison bertram tilt shift

Then, using a hobby knife, hollow out the inside part, and smoothen it down so there are no rough spots or burs.

dennison bertram tilt shift

Now take your plunger:


dennison bertram tilt shift

And cut a hole in the top where the stick is, just large enough to fit your lens.


dennison bertram tilt shift

Then go ahead and stick your lens onto the plunger to see if it fits. At this point I wouldn't really worry about gluing your lens down. In this particular construction the rubber will profile never provide decent enough support for you to feel comfortable letting your precious lens go without holding it as well. Just make the hole tight enough so that the lens is fairly snug. I even made groves so that I could 'screw' the lens into place. If you're enterprising enough, you could go out and buy the actual bayonet adaptor for whatever lens your using and then just screw it on.

dennison bertram tilt shift

Then you need to build your backing. Here I cut out a ring from the cardboard. The inner circle is the circumference and diameter of the lens cap, while the outer part matches the bottom of the plunger. I hotglued the parts together. (For expediency's sake. If you want to really use this lens set-up often, I recommend that you a: don't use cardboard or hotglue b: use screws for everything.)

dennison bertram tilt shift

Okay, go ahead and hotglue it together.


dennison bertram tilt shift

With your lens attached, you're all done and ready to shoot.


dennison bertram tilt shift


This lens works pretty well, surprisingly well actually. The image quality is awesome as the lens is a Zeiss and doesn't have any optical interference between your CCD Chip and the lens itself. You can use this lens for art photography or architectural stuff where you're trying to adjust for lens distortion. If you want to get serious about building something like this to use for something like architecture where you'll need to be able to hold the lens in one place for a long time, and very still, consider using this article as a guide to how you might build this using an adjustable frame that would provide you with greater control over the range of motions. If you build this with a frame, consider using bellows instead of a plunger. I chose the plunger as I was looking for something flexible yet sturdy at the same time. Here focusing is a matter of squeezing the lens down, and twirling it around. Very practical. :-) Here's a shot I took with this lens.


dennison bertram tilt shift

Notice how I am able to keep the eyelashes crystal sharp in the picture, yet blur her body as the image gets closer to the bottom? It's a very effective method of controlling the viewers gaze, and keeping it locked. You can do the same thing using gradient maps and Gaussian blur in photoshop, but in my opinion it never looks as good. Besides, you can do this on film. Enjoy!

PS: This article was originally published by me in the magazine, DigitalniFoto in the Czech Republic.

Labels: , , , ,


53 Comments:

  • Hi,
    have you modified the lens itself? As far as I know lensbabies have only a frontlens and nothing else. Have you removed the other glasses from the tube? Can you adjust the aperture and what is the effect of a stopped down lens?

    Thanks very much, Bence from Hungary

    By Anonymous, At 5:27 AM  

  • Hi Dennison,

    I have built my own lens since then. The same Biometar 80 with a Sigma plastic EOS bayonet. I can recommend the Polski Fiat gearbox rubber cloche as well. (You could know this car from Prague :) It is flexible and hard enough to screw the mount on it.

    Lovely stuff, thanks very much for the instructions!

    Bence

    By Anonymous, At 12:27 AM  

  • Pretty interesting approach; thank you for posting!

    A couple of questions...
    1. Including the lens, what was the total cost, roughly?
    2. When you move the lens to an off-axis position, does it stay in place pretty easily? I'm thinking of both longer exposures as well as trying to reshoot something I liked seeing on computer...

    Thanks again!

    jerry

    By Anonymous, At 4:12 PM  

  • Dropped you a mention in my current blog http://howlinpix.blogspot.com
    in case you're interested...

    By the blind spot, At 12:22 PM  

  • hlp - thanks! Only thing - I clicked on your link, but didn't see any info on the questions I'd wondered about. Care to show me where I missed your answers? The technique sounds pretty interesting!

    Thanks!
    jerry

    By Anonymous, At 9:15 PM  

  • hi.. I was wondering.. to build my shift tilt lens. could i also use a slide projector lens? because in my town that is the closest i can get to find a med. format or enlarger lens.. thank you very much.. Henry Guggs

    By Man on Fire, At 9:09 AM  

  • will this work with a 50mm lense as well? I am hoping to get it to work on my canon 20d but a 80mm would be too much for the x1.6 cropping factor.

    By jaybussiere@yahoo.com, At 8:11 PM  

  • http://plumbing.hardwarestore.com/51-285-plungers/black-master-plunger-shorty--607761.aspx

    By Casey J Benson, At 11:37 AM  

  • Nice hack! And to Bence - I love the Polski Fiats! I lived in Krakow April - August 2005. I know that roller skate of a car quite well. =)

    By Anonymous, At 10:28 PM  

  • Funnily enough, I accidently ended up with a lense that did tilt-shift... Years ago, I shot with a Nikon N90 with a large zoom lens, and used to ride my bike everywhere with the camera on the back... the vibration made the elements inside the lens come unscrewed... and the front element was moveable... I got some breathtaking macro shots of butterflies, with the kind of selective focus you only usually get with a 4x5... sadly, a camera repair person looked at the lens to see what was wrong, took off the front filter, and the front element fell on the floor... oops. Still have the pics, tho.

    By designdroid, At 1:43 AM  

  • Do you think you could post a couple more sample photos, showing the flexibility of the plunger style TS focusing?

    By Roy Berman, At 10:17 PM  

  • If you don't want to make your own you should check out a product called the lensbaby. You can find more information here- http://www.lensbabies.com

    By Anonymous, At 11:57 AM  

  • Hi,
    Can you tell me if you can focus to infnity with your lens ?

    regards

    By guzmoc, At 11:32 AM  

  • lensbabies are overpriced.

    By Anonymous, At 7:58 AM  

  • Hi, this is an amazing idea! i will definatly be trying it, thanks alot for the inspiration.

    By Anonymous, At 2:48 PM  

  • I always liked the lensbaby, but I've never actually bought one. I used to just take the lens off and use my 'hand' as the 'bellows'. Lots of light leaking and flooding your exposure always produced these dreamy washed out images. I'm glad more folks are trying things like this now-a-days; much cheaper than loading 4x5 sheet film with a real view camera!!

    By Jas, At 11:11 PM  

  • very interesting. the lens babies do not have the exact same effect. i find they have more of a linear blur (for lack of a better term, kindof like a motion blur) that i personally don't like. this looks definitely more like a tilt shift lens. congrats!!!

    By julianwainwright, At 5:20 AM  

  • What is the name of the lens that is on the pictures? is it MC BIOMETAR 2,8/80
    CARL ZEISS JENA DDR ?

    By Ziever, At 2:24 PM  

  • yea but lensbabies cost $150 for a plastic tube!

    By Anonymous, At 9:15 AM  

  • yea but lensbabies cost $150 for a plastic tube!

    By Anonymous, At 9:18 AM  

  • Cool idea. I plan on doing this today. Have you concidered an easy way to mount to a standard 50mm reversed? Cheap macro photography... Lensbabies are cool, but the lens quality is crap, and certainly not for $150....

    By Photozz, At 8:49 AM  

  • Any idea where i can get a plunger like this? I've looked in every store i can find, and no one stocks these types anymore. I ended up ordering from the site shown in this comment thread and it ended up being just hard molded plastic which wont work at all. Apparently in the US, we can't get a pure rubber ribbed plunger like this...any ideas anyone?'

    -Mark
    www.markmyshots.com

    By Anonymous, At 8:45 PM  

  • I'm interested in building a frame fro the lens like you mentioned at the end of your article (which is very well done I might add). It looks as if you were going to link to a site mentioning this but, no go?

    By Anonymous, At 9:24 PM  

  • I'm having a really hard time finding any sort of flexible bellows here in the U.S. I've looked at every art and hobby store in the city, a few hardware stores too. I was specifically trying to find a bellows squeeze bottle but nobody carries them.

    By JD, At 5:19 PM  

  • Wow! Look at all the comments I am behind on! In regards to the last comment: The bellows here are made from a toliet plunger. Nothing fancy! Any sort of material will do to be honest. Look around, I am sure there are small plungers around that you could use. dennison

    By dennison, At 11:18 PM  

  • Hey! What a great project! I just got a Canon Rebel XT and was wondering what sort of lens you would use on the Rebel to get the effect you got? I know for film you want a larger size lens then for the format of the camera that you have. But I'm a little confused about the "format" size of an 8 megapixel camera? Thanks for the help!

    By overnite@gmail.com, At 8:09 PM  

  • overnite: It's APS-C sized.

    By Anonymous, At 2:42 PM  

  • overnite:

    A 350d is APS-C sized which is smaller than a 35mm lense. A normal 35mm lense would be classes as a larger format so should work ok. (Any lense with an EF mount)

    By mole2k, At 2:08 AM  

  • Hi,

    I love the idea!
    I did build my own today, but I have a question.
    I use a 80/2.8 Mamiya lens on a Nikon D70. My problem is that I did pretty much end up with a wonderful macro but I cannot focus on anything closer than 30-40 cm.
    I can get the bayonet of the Lens from 1-5 cm from the body but so far ... only nice macros.
    Any idea what to do?

    Thanks,

    Robert

    By robertho"AT"mac"DOT"com, At 10:10 PM  

  • "I use a 80/2.8 Mamiya lens on a Nikon D70. My problem is that I did pretty much end up with a wonderful macro but I cannot focus on anything closer than 30-40 cm.
    I can get the bayonet of the Lens from 1-5 cm from the body but so far ... only nice macros.
    Any idea what to do?"

    It sounds like your lens is too far from the digital chip which essentially makes it a 'macro'. Try measuring the distance from the film plane (there should be a little marker on the d70 near the back that shows exactly where the film plane is) to the lense. You want to make this distance about the same as it would have been on the camera the lens was intended for. If you don't have the original camera to measure the distance then just experiment. Try holding the lens up without the plunger, (It will work) pick an object in the distance and move the lens back and forth until it focuses. That's about the maximum distance you'll want to keep the lens from the body to keep things sharp and not=macro.

    By dennison, At 11:58 PM  

  • You are the MacGyver of photography. :-)

    By Cor, At 12:24 AM  

  • ... macro ... distance from sensor...

    yeah, which means one can't use an EF lens on an EF/EF-S body to make this happen. Unless all you want is a macro lens. So put your 50mm away and buy an FD or smth medium format on ebay.

    luck.

    By Anonymous, At 10:54 PM  

  • Hi. Wonderful Idea. I have being searching and I am wondering if you can get the same effect with this lens like a Speedgraphic.

    By Anonymous, At 3:29 PM  

  • Pretty cool!

    Now if you could only make a phone out of a shoe!
    ~ "missed it by that much"
    Agent 86

    By Anonymous, At 6:15 AM  

  • Pretty cool!

    Now if you could only make a phone out of a shoe!
    ~ "missed it by that much"
    Agent 86

    By Anonymous, At 6:16 AM  

  • I think stores like B&H and Adorama ,prette soon ,
    will start to sell plungers...

    By abc, At 5:08 PM  

  • Hi dennison,

    I'm having a lot of trouble with this project. I have a Canon EOS 300D and my old Minolta MC ROKKOR - PF 1:1.4 f=58mm. The only thing I can do with this is taking macro pictures 5cm from the object. What went wrong? Please help.

    By Anonymous, At 9:17 AM  

  • To the commentator above:

    Well if you are using a minolta lens then it sounds like you are not using a Medium format lens. As I mention in the article it is very important to use a lens from a format LARGER than what you are using. If you have a 35mm type DSLR then you need at least a lens made for a 645 (medium format) camera for this hack to work. The hack will work with a regular 35mm lens (like your minolta) but you will only be able to take macro photos. This is because you are essentially building yourself a macro-bellow system, not a tilt shift system (although it's tilt shift for macro) I would explain the whole technical aspect about the focal distance and everything, except I just got home and it's extremely late for me. Long story short- you have the wrong lens. You need to find something for a larger format camera. Try your local camera store and ask them. Even old-time lenses will work for this project and you can probably find these pretty cheap. Enjoy! -dennison

    By dennison, At 6:39 PM  

  • I found this plunger http://www.amazon.co.uk/Monument-1460y-Handy-Plunger-Black/dp/B0001P0F4K/sr=1-5/qid=1165490190/ref=sr_1_5/026-2116564-0687612?ie=UTF8&s=diytools

    By Anonymous, At 3:18 AM  

  • I found this plunger http://www.amazon.co.uk/Monument-1460y-Handy-Plunger-Black/dp/B0001P0F4K/sr=1-5/qid=1165490190/ref=sr_1_5/026-2116564-0687612?ie=UTF8&s=diytools

    By Anonymous, At 3:18 AM  

  • http://www.cyberbeach.net/~dbardell/bellows.html for if you cannot find a bellows.

    By Anonymous, At 3:31 AM  

  • it also works fine if you take out the first piece of glass from a 35 mm lens

    By Anonymous, At 7:06 AM  

  • Hmmm, remove the first element on a 35mm lens? Well I wouldn't recommend that. Perhaps that works for some types of lenses but not necessarily for all. For example, telephoto lenses, zoom lenses, or aspherical lenses mostly likely not work without the first lens element, and probably never work again in general!

    By dennison, At 9:02 AM  

  • did that with a fuji 50mm lens. a simple three pieces of glass lens. On more complex lenses this will not work. but you can also do it with an ordinary looking glass. (damn English vocabulary: what sherlock holmes used). Tested it, it works. next thing is to try to recover the aperture from the busted lens.

    Oh and when no bellows can be found, fold them yourselve in black paper. mine works fine

    By Anonymous, At 5:05 AM  

  • making bellows http://www.cyberbeach.net/~dbardell/bellows.html. but if you make smaller ones, like needed for this project. use heavier black paper and no internal support. So it is only the last step you have to do. If you have the fingers for it you can make it hexagonal, as I did. It looks better then a sqaure.

    By Anonymous, At 5:11 AM  

  • Hiya,

    What view will using a MF 80mm lens give on a 35mm body? Will it "look" like a 50mm?

    Need to know so I can figure out what lens to purchase.

    Thanks

    By Drime, At 5:59 PM  

  • "What view will using a MF 80mm lens give on a 35mm body? Will it "look" like a 50mm?"

    No, it won't. Remember it will still still be a 80mm lens, you're just using a tiny part of the frame. So no, it won't look like a "50mm". Forive me for not knowing the exact conversion off hand (I'm sure you can google it) but as your are just cropping a small part of the frame it will "look" (as in have the same frame of view) as a moderate telephoto lens, probably around 120mm or 150mm.

    I know that 80mm on Medium format is roughly equivalent to 50mm on 35mm, but that is when you are trying to find a lens on 35mm that has about the same field of view. In this project we are still using the 80mm lens, so it's still 80mm. We are just using a small crop of the frame. That's all.

    By dennison, At 1:08 AM  

  • I'm a machinist and hobby photog Check out this link I believe the arm could be easily adapted to this mod and provide steady support for long exposure shots
    http://www.wttool.com/product-exec/product_id/16608/nm/Noga_reg_Test_Indicator_Holder_Arm

    By Anonymous, At 4:16 AM  

  • Thanks for your design
    I Try it on my manuel SLR Camera with 50mm Lens (lens is for 35mm)
    Now ı'w got Lens and film distance problem, also I cant get clean imagine (distance is 50+70mm)
    What is my mistake

    By silwerstar, At 3:34 PM  

  • silwerstar:

    You must use a lens intended for a format LARGER than the camera you are using. If you are using a 35mm SLR camera then you can not use a lens for a 35mm SLR camera. You need something at least for 645 format.

    -dennison

    By dennison, At 1:55 AM  

  • Has anyone tried a CV boot for this hack?

    Vinh

    By Vinh Dao, At 2:13 PM  

  • any galleries?

    By Anonymous, At 8:36 AM  

  • try using a motorcycle front fork boot, not only is it about the same size as camera body cap but they are flexible enough to stretch to fit outside diameter of lens. use hose claps to attach firmly. boot can be cut to any desired length and are extremely flexible, shift, tilt stretch squeeze, have a ball.

    By Fledermas, At 8:52 PM  

Post a Comment



<< Home